Liability Possibilities for Third-Party Privacy Invasions in Agnew-Americano v Equifax Canada

Yona Gal, J.D., LL.MCyber Risks, Cyber Security, Privacy, Technology and Internet0 Comments

A company learns its cybersecurity is vulnerable to hacking but fails to implement preventative measures.  Hackers attack and access the private data of clients.  Can these clients sue the company for the tort of privacy invasion (“intrusion upon seclusion”) or can the company escape liability because it has only allowed a third-party invasion?

The question turns on the definition of invasion.  As held in the leading case of Jones v Tsige, the tort of intrusion upon seclusion consists of three elements:

  1. Intentional or reckless conduct;
  2. That invades the defendant’s privacy; and
  3. The invasion must reasonably be regarded as highly offensive causing distress, humiliation or anguish.

Does allowance of a third-party invasion meet the second requirement?

In deciding which of two actions should proceed as a class action in Ontario, the Court in Agnew-Americano v Equifax Canada expressed preliminary support favouring the possibility of liability for third-party invasions.  The Court held claims that third-party invasions could attract liability for the tort of intrusion upon seclusion are not “fanciful or frivolous” but supported by a “viable argument.”  In addition to drawing upon limited case law, the Court held that such claims are in tune with the broad and liberal approach courts have taken to privacy rights.

If you require legal advice and representation with respect to a Privacy Law matter, please contact us for an initial consultation.


Brief informational summaries about insurance litigation, commercial litigation and family law litigation matters in the courts of Ontario and Canada are periodically published on our website. Please note that our website content is for informational purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon to provide legal advice. If you require legal advice, please request an initial consultation with Gilbertson Davis LLP using the Request Consultation Form on this webpage or by contacting our Intake Coordinator on (416) 979-2020, ext. 223 (both subject to the Terms of Use described on our Contact page).
Comments & Opinions by Gilbertson Davis LLP lawyers and staff on its Blog, or in media interviews, appearances or publications, or in professional publications, are personal to them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Firm or anyone at the Firm other than the individual expressing those comments or opinions.

About the Author

Yona Gal, J.D., LL.M

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *